To protect our agricultural base, we’ve got to “Love the Land.”

lenore 1“Love the Land.”  It’s a phrase has haunted me since I heard it from Lenore Newman.  “We’ve got to love the land, or we’ll lose it,” she says.

Canada Research Chair in Food Security and the Environment at the University of the Fraser Valley, Dr. Newman has been a sought-after speaker recently on the Agricultural Land Reserve.  It’s on people’s minds now that the B.C. government has been reviewing the ALR and its governing Agricultural Land Commission.

Dr. Newman has strong scientific and intellectual arguments for preserving ALR farmland for food production, and against suburban sprawl, no matter how strong the development pressure.  But she also has an emotional message that rings true.  “We love food, but we don’t love land,” she says.  “That’s a disconnect.”

In some jurisdictions around the world there are laws and customs forbidding speculation and development on agricultural land.  France, for example, won’t allow just anyone to buy farmland, and citizens there strongly support local farmers and local food.  Yet in North America, we stand by while agricultural land is paved over. Specifically in B.C., we stand by while developers pressure the ALC to exclude lands from the ALR. We need to develop a passion for rural landscapes and farming, says Dr. Newman, not for romantic visions of “haybales and fiddles” but because we need food and because local food is better.

“Speculators are counting on the fact that we don’t care,” she said.  “But we have to care. We have to tell politicians that if they or others come after our land, we will come after them.”  At one event, it prompted audience members to give her a standing ovation.

When I first heard Dr. Newman, I was informed but also inspired. So I made a point of attending a second of her lectures, then had coffee with her on Commercial Drive at the cool Café Calabria, where she expanded on her ideas.  Here is an introduction to some of Dr. Newman’s arguments.

1. Fraser Valley agricultural land is among the best in world – and we’re going to need it as other sources dry up.  With only 0.2 per cent of Canada’s arable land, the Lower Mainland nevertheless generates 4.5 % of Canada’s farm gate receipts. Meanwhile, California is drought-stricken and extreme weather threatens food production all over the world.  “People think food will just magically come from somewhere.  But one day we’ll wake up and discover that’s not so.”  Unfortunately, the just-announced changes to the ALR are likely to weaken farmland protection.  Hear it in her own words from her blog:

2. The ALR does indeed protect farmland.  Since its implementation in the 1970s, the loss of agricultural land in the Lower Mainland has dropped 90%.  “Without the ALR our land would soon be completely filled with development, all the way to Hope.  This is what keeps me up at night.”  The ALR has also acted as a check on urban sprawl, encouraging the kind of judicious densification, balanced with green space for liveability, that is ‘Vancouverism.’  Dr. Newman contrasts our region with that of Los Angeles, where former expanses of orange groves have disappeared to highways and suburban development.

3. To work effectively, the ALC needs political support and resources to counteract galloping development pressure.  There are more than 900 exclusion applications now on the desk of the ALC – mostly for land purchased in the last five years.  That suggests speculation, especially considering that Fraser Valley farmland is worth about $100,000 an acre, but once taken out of the ALR it can be worth $1.5 million an acre, she said.

4. Now is a terrible time to be getting rid of farmland.  People, organizations and nations everywhere are scooping up global agricultural land, as populations rise and environmental problems undermine food production.  Despite the demand, however, selling it off is a bad idea.  As realtors say about land, ‘they’re not making any more of it.’

5. There’s a myth that Lower Mainland agricultural land is sitting idle, but in Abbotsford, more than 90 % of farmland is actively worked.   Closer to the city the percentage is lower but that is partly due to the kind of land speculation that shouldn’t be allowed, she believes.  Where farmland is idle, that’s not due to lack of demand; there are many young people who want to farm and who need access to dirt, which contributes to the tragic nature of the speculation. “There’s a return to agrarianism.  Farming is coming back,” she said.  “But is it coming back in time?”

6. Urban agriculture is a positive trend, but it won’t feed us.  City farming is useful for educating people to care more about their food.  But at this northern latitude, we can’t grow more than small amounts of food on rooftops and backyards.

7. Industrial farming is not the enemy.  “People think local food has to be small-scale, with a farmer in overalls.”  But some crops need large-scale production.  We need to encourage a combination of methods.

8. Solutions exist.  Dr. Newman suggests that we:

  • halt all ALR exclusions for at least 1-2 decades, to stop the land speculation.
  • strongly encourage farming on farmland.
  • enact farm-friendly housing policies, e.g. building on hillsides, controlling unoccupied housing, and encouraging small lot sizes and high density.
  • prosecute damage, such as illegal dumping, to agricultural lands.

For this, citizens need to care. We need to love the land.  In another post soon, I’ll explore specific ways that you can demonstrate you love the land.  Meanwhile, your comments are welcome.


Dr. Newman’s post on peak food:

 Nov 13/13 op-ed piece on the need to freeze ALR exclusions:

Post on a recent university by Dr. Newman:

 Brendan Hurley and Lenore Newman on ALR and the city:

Background on ‘Vancouverism” :

 Background on Lenore Newman:






Housing should recognize that people need people.

People need people.  Some people also seem to need dogs, but that’s another story.   For now, let’s talk about humans.Neighbours in hallway winter:spring 2014

Here’s a snapshot of a few, who are some of my neighbours here on the fourth floor of our condo complex in Vancouver’s Kitsilano.  If you examine the image, you’ll notice that the neighbours seem to be enjoying chatting and visiting with each other.  From L ro R, that’s Claire, Heather, Doug, and my husband, Harley.  The dogs are Chimi (big), Kipu (little), and Roxy (held by Doug).

You’ll also notice that the actual environment is pretty uninviting.  The hallway is narrow, the walls featureless and without interest.  And there’s no place for the people to sit.  Dogs are okay with the carpet, but most human beings are not.

Yet several times on every single day, this bunch of people and others come out of their apartments and spend time meeting and talking in our hallway.

They have dogs.  They’re nice people.  They get along.  But the real reason they meet and visit is that people need people.

Which brings me to a question that’s been bothering me for years.  Why isn’t more of our society’s housing designed for frequent and convenient human interaction?  Why aren’t there more readily accessible common areas?

Our particular condo buildings, three of them side by side, do have a common area.  It’s a handsome room with couches around a fireplace, and windows overlooking a streetscape and trees.  For a pre-arranged party, it’s perfect.  But for us, it’s three floors down the elevator, and across a parking lot — not the sort of trek you’d take for everyday chatting with neighbours.

It seems to me that much of today’s housing is organized not to encourage interaction but to discourage it.  Most apartment buildings are designed for isolation.  It’s unnecessary and it’s painful, especially for people who live alone.

What can we do about it?   Suggestions welcome.

Meanwhile, I’m going to walk out my apartment door and chat with my neighbours.

Our vision must be stronger than our fears.

Guy Dauncey insists on being positive.  If we’re going to make progress on Guy Dauncey photothe big issues of our time, we need to focus on the visionary possibilities that could define our economy and society, he says.  Instead of ruminating on the problems facing the world, we can devote our energy to solutions.  “The power of our vision must be stronger than the power of our fears.”  I need to hear that, so I rode my bike downtown to hear Mr. Dauncey speak at the Vancouver Public Library recently. Having experienced his high-energy brilliance in past lectures, I didn’t want to miss his talk entitled Imagining a Beautiful Green Future: Vancouver 2032.

Continue reading »

Turning food waste into animal feed addresses two problems at once.

Here’s a powerful idea that may provide a quantum leap in addressing food-system problems. It’s the initiative of the Vancouver company Enterra Feed Corp., which takes food waste and transforms it into renewable food for fish, livestock, and plants.  Using a clever technology involving insects, Enterra has developed a way to take urban-sized piles of bruised tomatoes, stale-dated cakes, fish offal and more, and transform it into fish meal, oilmeal for livestock, and plant fertilizer.

Continue reading »

Powerful ideas from our first ‘Community Conversation’ on food

Getting people together to share ideas can be exhilarating and productive, especially when the topic is so central to our lives as food.  That was the focus of a Community Conversation held at Vancouver’s Gordon Neighbourhood House on January 14, 2014, which I co-facilitated along with GNH Community Food Advocate Andrew Christie, with assistance from UBC Bachelor of Social Work practicum students Emily Melzer, Fibby Pan, and Markayla Benstead.  More than 40 neighbours attended to voice their experiences in trying to access good food and eat in ways that are healthy for  individuals and community.

Continue reading »

Food banks can be transformed to address the roots of hunger.

“Is there anything I could do to help?” asked the young food-bank client.  She was there for her weekly bag of groceries, but it would be another half-hour before recipients would be allowed to line up.  Meanwhile, she was able-bodied and wanted to assist at the busy tables heaped with bread, packaged foods, and vegetables.

Continue reading »

Too many antibiotics in livestock. To learn more, check out WSPA.

I’m glad to see animal-welfare group WSPA – the World Society for the Protection of Animals – devoting so much energy to the medical crisis of antibiotic resistance.  WSPA held a telephone Town Hall yesterday to inform people about how and why this issue relates to animals.  Because in Canada as in the U.S. and some other countries, antibiotics are being over-used – and it’s not primarily by doctors or patients but in the intensive production of livestock for human consumption.

Continue reading »